Barbados Government Acknowledges Responsibility for Gun Dealer’s “Forcible Removal”

Govt's appeal of Brent Thomas matter set for hearing in February - CNC3

In a significant development, the Barbados government has admitted accountability for the controversial incident involving the “forcible removal” of gun dealer Brent Thomas from his hotel room in 2022.

Revelations emerged through a letter obtained by Trinidadian publication Newsday, where Roger Forde, KC, representing Barbados’ Attorney General Dale Marshall, SC, conveyed that the government had acknowledged liability on legal advice. The attorney emphasized that the State of Barbados should take responsibility concerning the breach of section 18 of the Constitution of Barbados, which guarantees the right to a fair hearing and protection under the law.

The letter also highlighted the ongoing negotiations for an agreed settlement, which is expected to be substantial, in response to Thomas’s legal action seeking compensation for what was described as the “egregious conduct” of Barbadian authorities. The incident involved Thomas being detained, handcuffed, and subsequently flown back to Trinidad without due process, sparking legal challenges and public outcry.

The legal proceedings initiated by Thomas, the owner of the Specialist Shooters Training Centre (SSTC), have brought to light serious concerns regarding the actions of law enforcement agencies and their compliance with constitutional rights. The case, which has garnered significant attention, underscores the importance of upholding legal standards and protecting individuals’ rights, even in matters concerning law enforcement.

Thomas’s legal team has demanded transparency from the Barbadian authorities, seeking detailed information on the sequence of events leading to his detention and subsequent repatriation. The requests include identifying individuals involved, exchanges between relevant parties, and reports from law enforcement and security agencies.

The acknowledgment of liability by the Barbados government marks a significant step in the legal proceedings, potentially paving the way for a resolution to this contentious issue. As negotiations continue and legal proceedings unfold, the case serves as a reminder of the importance of accountability and adherence to legal principles in ensuring justice for all parties involved.